Search for: "Burwell v. Burwell"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2015, 6:43 pm
On Wednesday the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in King v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 3:49 am
Burwell, returning the Catholic university’s challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s birth-control mandate to the lower courts after last Term’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:04 pm
Dole (1987) and NFIB v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:03 pm
[Legal Cheek] * King v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:08 pm
Burwell, the Catholic university based in Indiana asked the Court to order a reconsideration of its claim based on last Term’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am
Burwell, the Obamacare case. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Finally, it is unsettling to see Jack positively refer to Bush v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:02 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Burwell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Today, SCOTUSblog correspondent Howe used it to take in the entire oral argument in King v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:45 am
Oral arguments in King v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:23 pm
Burwell: Alas, I find that Ilya Somin over at Volokh’s is, in the context of King v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 6:40 pm
One of the only practical benefits for federalism to emerge out of NFIB v Sebelius was the 3-vote opinion’s strengthening of the limit against Congress’ placing “coercive” conditions on federal grants in Part IV(B). [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 6:12 pm
Burwell. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
Burwell. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 9:45 am
Just because the plaintiffs’ standing to sue in King v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
Rob WeinerDuring the Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 11:03 am
Burwell [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:38 am
Burwell. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am
Burwell, the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:35 pm
I have a new piece at Politico that follows up on the federalism arguments in King v. [read post]
