Search for: "California v. Jones" Results 941 - 960 of 1,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm by Eugene Lee
” Judge Major then ordered six of Qualcomm’s lawyers to be referred to the State Bar of California for investigation of their ethical violations and possible discipline. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:31 pm
Citing the California Supreme Court in Marriage of Jones (1975) 13 Cal.3d 457, the Riverside justices stated "[s]o long as the marriage subsists, the [injured spouse's] reduced earnings worked a loss to the community. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by stevemehta
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/4avwrhj (Stephen Arnold) Judge Scheindlin Rules That Metadata is Integral Part of ESI, Admonishes Counsel for Failing to Meet and Confer Concerning Form of ESI Production - http://tinyurl.com/4ul9xmm (Jennifer Hradil) Gavel to Gavel: Pitfalls of Monitoring Social Media - http://tinyurl.com/6j3o8uz (Byrona Maule) Government Appeals and Seeks a Stay of Judge Scheindlin’s FOIA Order on Metadata in NDLON v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It may have been that Ms Ehrenfeld had a potential defences to the claim – she could have set up a Reynolds defence of responsible journalism, or that she could have argued that it should be struck out as an abuse of process on Jameel grounds (Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
May 19, 2003) (applying California law).ConnecticutLevesque v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm by Nick Holmes
Lord Justice Toulson in R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467 famously bemoaned the complexity of legislation: To a worryingly large extent, statutory law is not practically accessible today, even to the courts whose constitutional duty it is to interpret and enforce it. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm
  Absent a specific assurance of adequacy, insurers do not have a general duty to investigate and inform the insured of adequacy of coverage, Jones v. [read post]