Search for: "Cox v. Cox" Results 941 - 960 of 1,842
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2014, 2:18 pm
The Ninth Circuit made bloggers a tiny bit happier today. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:59 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court largely relies on the Virginia Supreme Court’s decision in Network Solutions v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Gary Cox, Craig Humphris and Donna Meredith -- In the decision of Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 50 (order), the High Court of Australia, Australia's supreme court, confirmed that methods of medical treatment are a "manner of manufacture" and therefore represent a patentable invention in Australia. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
Cox (University of New Mexico School of Law, 2013) recently published an article entitled, What’s Right Is Wrong and What to Do About It After Oldham v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Cox, 2007 WL 5160499 (N.Y.Sup.), 4 (N.Y.Sup.,2007.))So if failing to inform a client is not per se ineffectiveness, are we off the hook? [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:39 am by Laura H. Juillet
In the latest judgment from the EAT on this issue, the case of Cox v Essex County Fire and Rescue Service, Mr Cox had informed his employer that he was suffering from bi-polar disorder, but this was never properly confirmed to the employer by medical evidence (not least because Mr Cox would not agree to the disclosure of his medical records). [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:31 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Ver el vídeo íntegro de la actividad: Video streaming by UstreamArchivado en: EVENTOS, PRO BONO, VÍDEOS [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 9:00 am by Ellen D. Marcus
Amicus (or friend of the court) briefs are pouring into the Supreme Court in the case of Lawson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Cox, 477 So. 2d 963 (Ala. 1985), that failure by the plaintiff (as opposed to a prescribing physician) to read a drug label precluded any finding of causation:[N]othing in the nature of [defendant’s] inadequate warning prevented plaintiff from reading it. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:28 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 111365 (SD NY, Aug. 7, 2013), a New York federal district court dismissed a suit by a Muslim inmate who complained that he could not attend Friday Jumu'ah services while he was in disciplinary confinement.In Cox v. [read post]