Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 941 - 960
of 4,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2019, 3:48 am
Under Singapore law, bad faith embraces— ...not only actual dishonesty but also dealings which would be considered as commercially unacceptable by reasonable and experienced persons in a particular trade, even though such dealings may otherwise involve no breach of any duty, obligation, prohibition or requirement that is legally binding upon the registrant of the trade mark (Weir Warman Ltd v Research & Development Pty Ltd [2007] 2 SLR (R) 1073). [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 1:16 pm
C. 1491(a). [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The basic elements of fraudulent concealment are (a) actual concealment; (b) of a material fact; (c) knowledge of the facts concealed; (d) intent to mislead another into relying upon such conduct; (e) actual reliance; and (f) injury resulting to such person because of such reliance. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
&C.4th 375, 2007 WL 6853118 (2007)[see also companion decision: Decker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:51 pm
D’Onofrio v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
This argument was rejected on the evidence;(b) The Applicant’s actions were dishonest, improper or otherwise unacceptable, in that the trademarks applied for were designed to put pressure on Dr Lee to comply with HAA’s demands to step down and aimed to usurp the Opponent’s role as the alumni club. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:13 am
The Examiner Division had stipulated that such redundant subject matter should be removed in view of Rule 42(1)(c) EPC and/or Rule 48(1)(c) EPC. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:57 am
c. [read post]
NY Appellate Court Holds Zoning Board’s Interpretation of Zoning Code is Irrational and Unreasonable
8 Dec 2023, 9:52 am
This post was authored by Patrick Faivre, Touro University Jacob D. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
The Supreme Court’s major ruling was that the “due to unusual circumstances” language of CEQA Guidelines § 15300.2(c) – which provides an exception to otherwise-applicable categorical exemptions “where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances” – has some independent significance and utility, and is not merely meaningless surplusage. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
§ 230(c)(1); Barrett v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
Newman (1998), 22 E.T.R. (2d) 150 (B.C.S.C.); Mordo v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm
See Composite Exhibit D attached hereto. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:39 am
C. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am
W/o proof that there’d been panhandling in garages, couldn’t ban panhandling in garages. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
[38] Once it is established that the will was read by the testator, or the contents otherwise brought to his or her attention, and that he or she appeared to understand it, the testator will be presumed to know and approve of the will: see for example Vout v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
—San Antonio July 27, 2016, pet. filed) (dissenting opinion by Justice Rebeca C. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:40 am
Tortilla Factory, LLC v. [read post]
