Search for: "D. Hudson"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 5:17 am
3-20-2010 New York:A Hudson Falls teen who was serving a prison sentence for child sexual abuse hanged himself Friday in a state prison in Dutchess County, officials said.Adam D. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:41 pm
But if you take that view, I’d ask you to answer whether the exclusionary rule should apply to Officer Bad in Scenarios 1 and 3 and Officer Good in Scenario 2. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
(Lytton, Timothy D., Using Litigation to Make Public Health Policy: Theoretical and Empirical Challenges in Assessing Product Liability, Tobacco, and Gun Litigation The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January, 2004., p. 12) This article will discuss how products liability litigation has deterred the production of defective products and caused many manufacturers to be more conscious of safety in developing, designing, testing, marketing and labeling their products, to consider and… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Jackson, Civil Action No. 09–cv–02148–REB–MJW (D. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
The Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 241 (1981) states: In determining whether a failure to render or to offer performance is material, the following circumstances are significant: (a) the extent to which the injured party will be deprived of the benefit which he reasonably expected; (b) the extent to which the injured party can be adequately compensated for the part of that benefit of which he will be deprived; (c) the extent to which the party failing to perform or to offer to perform will… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 5:00 pm
“Who would have thought he’d be celebrating his birthday and then have so much tragedy? [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:22 pm
" I agree that if you're a federal thrift you'd be foolish not to be seriously exploring a charter change. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:56 am
Needless to say, if I was a broker or underwriter, I’d descend on the region and market the need for cyber insurance till I dropped. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm
The premises referred to as store #393 is the anchor tenant of the Hudson Corners Shopping Center, which is located at the corner of Hudson Road and Old Spartanburg Road in Greer. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:26 am
See: ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION 717: RPC 1.5(d)(2) — Contingency Fees in Criminal and Quasi-Criminal Matters. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm
Div. 1993), rev’d on other grounds, 135 N.J. 42 (1994); accord, State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm
”, published in the Law Office of Donald D. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am
. / CRANE D. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:00 pm
In the case of the proposed good faith exception for changing law, costs would only occur in those cases in which (a) the illegal search directly caused the discovery of the evidence (fruit-0f-the-poisonous tree), (b) the government would not have discovered the evidence had the unconstitutional search never occurred (inevitable discovery), (c) the government did not know the evidence some other way (independent source), (d) the defendant’s own rights were violated (standing), (e) the… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The California Air Resources Board announced Wednesday that it has penalized Conopco Inc. d/b/a Unilever $1.3 million for illegal consumer sales of AXE Deodorant Bodyspray for Men. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
It has become de rigeur for judges to denounce the “substantial societal costs” imposed by the exclusionary rule: Scalia did it Hudson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
It has become de rigeur for judges to denounce the “substantial societal costs” imposed by the exclusionary rule: Scalia did it Hudson v. [read post]
