Search for: "DOES 1-116"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
Daniel was detained on suspicion of drug smuggling, and an X-ray revealed that he had ingested no less than 116 sealed packages of cocaine. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:23 am
Willing is not willing, Kant says, if it does not produce an action. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
As established in the case law of the boards of appeal, as a matter of principle, the EPC foresees the absolute right to OPs under A 116(1) EPC 1973, but not the right to a telephone interview (cf. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
Somalia piracy—does wrong equal wrong? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:30 am
” Cogdell, supra, 116 N.J. at 15. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:55 pm
Here, claim 1 does not specify a reference for the asymmetry of the radiation source's placement within the expandable surface; however, the specification makes clear what the inventors contemplated as their invention. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If Pinnock and proportionality did apply then the Supreme Court would need to grapple with the detail of how proportionality should operate, procedurally and substantively (issues 1-4 above). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If Pinnock and proportionality did apply then the Supreme Court would need to grapple with the detail of how proportionality should operate, procedurally and substantively (issues 1-4 above). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Gary Herbert (R), the bill will take effect July 1. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
BER-C-116-08 (N.J. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:24 pm
§16-116-105(a) (compliance generally is “evidence” of non-defectiveness); Colorado: Colo. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:46 am
Id. at 116-17. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 8:49 am
., 116 N.J. 7, 16 (1989). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:03 pm
Wimberly, 988 So. 2d 116. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
[1] Against the grant of the patent in suit four oppositions were filed. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
Interestingly, the split does not appear to be along party lines, but rather along big city/small city and rural lines. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
Double N Earthmovers Ltd. v Edmonton (City), 213 AR 81 (ABQB), affd [2005] AJ No 221 (ABCA), affd 2007 SCC 3, [2007] 1 SCR 116, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2007/2007scc3/2007scc3.html This case is addresses the issue of compliance with the terms of a call for tenders. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
Double N Earthmovers Ltd. v Edmonton (City), 213 AR 81 (ABQB), affd [2005] AJ No 221 (ABCA), affd 2007 SCC 3, [2007] 1 SCR 116, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2007/2007scc3/2007scc3.html This case is addresses the issue of compliance with the terms of a call for tenders. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Federalism does well enough now: why federalism provides sufficient protection for the environment, and no other model is needed. 18 Penn St. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm
How does this lead to a motion to disqualify? [read post]
