Search for: "DUKES v. STATE"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 5:46 am
Dukes, 427 U.S. 297, 303 (1976) (stating that the judiciary may not "sit as a super-legislature to judge the wisdom or desirability of legislative polic[ies]" in areas that do not implicate fundamental rights or suspect classifications); Cellular Phone Taskforce v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:00 am
v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:10 am
Court of Appeals Ruling The Fifth District Court of Appeals recalled its ruling in State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:19 pm
In Durfee v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:51 pm
The case, Alasaad v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am
Today, the Court hears argument in McComish v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
Duke Power (1971) and its progeny). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:16 am
The Court recently addressed this same concern in Dukes v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 11:14 am
In Madey v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:55 pm
Governor of Alabama and United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Under United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
New York State Urban Development Corporation, which is up for consideration at today’s conference. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]
Ind. Courts - More on: COA will hear oral arguments today in dispute over Terre Haute mayor's office
9 Jul 2008, 1:35 pm
Some quotes:The Indiana Court of Appeals listened to arguments Tuesday in the case of Burke v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Dukes and its successors. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
Court-watchers are focusing on Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 1:12 pm
Dukes Reverse Details Isiogu v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:21 am
First place this year went to the writing team of Michael Duke and Edward Flores, along with editor Jacob Brandler, for their work on King v Burwell–the case challenging the tax credit structure of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
