Search for: "Davis v. United States"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
In the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:19 am
The United States finally invokes Chevron USA v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm
The case is Odyssey Marine Exploration v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm
Davis , 533 U.S. 678, 693 (2001). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
`District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion.' United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
Thompkins June 2, 2010 United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictions Tennessee v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:40 pm
Birke v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
Supreme Court precedence outlined in Davis v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:23 am
Supreme Court, issued at 10:52 p.m.:11A317 DAVIS, ANTHONY TROY V. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am
Davis. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Joe Kernan urges the Court to grant review in Davis v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:21 am
The transcript in Ocasio v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:34 pm
(That case, United Haulers Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am
CARY PRESS,;No 06-CV-6686 (JFB) (ARL);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed several undersized fish. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
Davis, 100 U.S. 257 (1880), and discussed the modern statute in Mesa v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:11 am
See United States v. [read post]
