Search for: "Defendant Doe 1" Results 941 - 960 of 46,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2017, 5:17 am by Dominic Simon
Land Rover defends the DEFENDER trade mark.There are few vehicles as iconic and instantly recognisable as the classic Land Rover. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:50 pm by Jon Sands
First, No. 11-30346 (10-1-13) (Paez with Ripple and Trott). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:36 pm by scanner1
SLAWTER ARCHITECTURE; and LAKE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Montana, and DOES 1-3, Defendants, JERRY L. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 8:27 am
§ § 1326(a)(1), (a)(2) and (b)(2).HELD: Where defendant does not object on procedural grounds that district court's method of determining his sentence is unreasonable, defendant forfeits right to appeal on that ground and review is only for plain error.Read the opinion here. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Although the Court of Appeals cites only one other student harassment case that resulted in a $1 million damages award, Anthony's award does not "shock the judicial conscience," which is the legal standard. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 7:17 am by Theodore Harvatin
While the opinion does not impact the prosecution of DUI cases in Illinois, it provides insight into how courts may rule on similar issues. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 4:54 am by SHG
Jail staff shall instead use duct tape, or a similar form of verbal restraint, to cover the inmate defendant’s mouth and allow the person to remain, so long as he or she does not constitute a safety threat as determined by jail staff. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:09 pm by fl_litig8r
While it’s definitely a positive to not have to prove half of your case, it does not mean that the defendant has agreed to pay you everything you think you deserve. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:42 am
" The Appellate Division ruled that under the circumstances, the acts alleged by Rew falls outside the scope of Doe’s employment and thus is not encompassed within the County’s duty to indemnify him should Rew prevail.Accordingly, naming Doe in any notice of claim otherwise required by General Municipal Law §50-e is not, under the circumstances, a "condition precedent" to Rew maintaining his lawsuit against Doe.* See Public Officers Law… [read post]