Search for: "Dev"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am
“Courts may review the record to determine whether the agency identified the relevant areas of environmental concern, took a hard look at them, and made a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its determination (see Matter of Chinese Staff & Workers’ Assn. v Burden, 19 NY3d 922, 924; Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 570; Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:51 am
Somerset Dev. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:18 am
Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:35 am
In response to a user’s question, “Why are these devs censoring reviews of their product? [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 1:40 pm
Mora Dev. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 11:59 pm
New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:02 pm
CONTRACTS, CORPORATION & ENTERPRISE LAW, GOVERNMENT LAW, INDIAN LAW Catskill Dev., LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
However, “a waiver of sovereign immunity cannot, on its own, extend a court’s subject matter jurisdiction” (Oneida Indian Nation v Phillips, 981 F3d at 171), and “[w]aivers of [sovereignty] are to be strictly construed in favor of the Tribe” (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Chukchansi Economic Dev. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 1:56 pm
First Prudential Dev. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:13 am
Dev. [read post]
19 May 2012, 7:33 am
Learn, make mistakes and polish your biz dev skills privately before applying them successfully in the real world. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:18 am
McDonnell Dev. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:23 am
” White Oak Property Dev., L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:26 am
In Versata Dev. [read post]
30 May 2018, 12:18 pm
., 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000) (functional requirements for comparability are not protected by copyright; protection is also limited by fair use); Lotus Dev. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:30 am
., 140 AD3d at 913; see SSJ Dev. of Sheepshead Bay I, LLC v Amalgamated Bank, 128 AD3d 674, 675; Dupps v Betancourt, 121 AD3d 746, 747). [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:57 am
Revisiting ice after injury, August 24, 2016, By Dev K. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
& Dev. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:20 am
In any event, the court properly denied the prediscovery motion as premature, given plaintiff’s showing that facts essential to justify opposition to defendant’s motion may lie within defendant’s exclusive knowledge or control (see CPLR 3212[f]; Lyons v New York City Economic Dev. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:28 pm
—===— From the law:/dev/null travel-related archives: Charleston SC: Greetings from Charleston! [read post]
