Search for: "Distinctive Brands, Inc." Results 941 - 960 of 1,243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 11:14 am by Sheppard Mullin
§ 1114(a) alleges that YSL is taking unfair advantage of the goodwill and brand recognition encompassed by the Christian Louboutin registered red sole mark. [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:36 am by Tron Emptage
Overseeing prescribing patterns at the physician level to establish appropriate/inappropriate use of brand name medications when an FDA-approved generic equivalent exists. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by admin
Using the term pilates to describe the particular type of exercise method weakened Pilates, Inc. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Brand as personality approach will merit a set of different rules. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:47 am by John L. Welch
North Atlantic Operating Co., Inc., Opposition No. 91157248 et al. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
There is still a distinction between personally identifiable and not identifiable information; scariest involve the former. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:09 am by gmlevine
” Although not quite apropos, but emphasizing that benefit of the doubt favors the respondent is the Panel’s observation in Quester Group, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc., 618 F.3d 1025, 1032-33 (9th Cir. 2010) (citations, quotation marks and formatting omitted). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:14 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.March 2, 2011 - 2 PM: In re Country Music Association, Inc., Serial Nos. 78906900 and 78901341 [Section 2(e)(1) refusals of COUNTRY MUSIC ASSOCIATION and CMA COUNTRY MUSIC ASSOCIATION & Design for "Association services, namely, promoting country music, and promoting the interests of country music entertainers and the country music recording industry," on the ground of mere descriptiveness… [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 2:30 am by gmlevine
Similarly with “target” as in when used consistent with the cultural understandings of the word and not targeting the trademark owned by Target Brands, Target Brands, Inc. v. [read post]