Search for: "Dodd v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 1,142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm by Charles Kotuby
It has been nearly a year since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Morrision v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 7:33 am by Joe Wallin
The SEC has proposed new regulations to implement the “bad boy” provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:08 am by Luke Green
On the other hand, private actions, as opposed to enforcement actions, constitute the bulk of securities class actions in the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:42 am by Kara OBrien
New Whistleblower Rules On May 25, 2011, the SEC adopted final rules implementing the whistleblower program Congress prescribed in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:11 am by StartUpAdmin
The SEC has proposed draft rules to implement Section 926 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:28 pm by admin
Zuckerman stated that SOX was turning into a “robust remedy for whistleblowers,” pointing to the ARB’s decisions in Sylvester and Johnson v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:32 am
Concepcion states the current interpretation of the law, it may not be the final word on this topic. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel O'Rielly
 In one of the first cases to analyze the preemption standard contained in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, in Baptisa v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Twelve Steps to Good Corporate Governance: In light of the changes wrought by the Dodd-Frank Act and other developments, the corporate governance landscape has been transformed. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  The case does note the use of phone records and states that "Gupta and Rajaratnam very likely had a telephone conversation. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am by Kara OBrien
In addition, Dodd-Frank prohibits an adviser from registering with the SEC under the Advisers Act if it (a) has assets under management of less than $100 million, and (b) is required to register in the state in which it maintains its principal office and place of business and, if registered, would be subject to examination by such state. [read post]