Search for: "Doe Governmental Agencies 1-5"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2011, 7:09 am
H.R.5; Status. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:09 am
H.R.5; Status. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:31 am
5) What the church does and how. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Fletcher (1866), L.R. 1 Ex. 265, aff’d (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330 for that loss. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 11:59 am
.), took effect on July 1, 1983, and imposed certain privacy rights obligations on approximately 250 federal government departments and agencies by limiting the use and disclosure of personal information. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Because it was required to defer to the reasonable construction of a statute by the agency that Congress had authorized to interpret it, the court held that the MMWA precluded enforcement of pre-dispute agreements such as Porsche's that required mandatory binding arbitration of consumer warranty claims. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:07 pm
If the victim of a violation of s. 794.011, former s. 794.05, Florida Statutes 1995, s. 800.04, s. 826.04, or s. 847.0135(5) is under the age of 18, the applicable period of limitation, if any, does not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of 18 or the violation is reported to a law enforcement agency or other governmental agency, whichever occurs earlier. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
H.R.5; Status. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:04 am
Section 417.007, states that the State Fire Marshall "shall immediately investigate a fire" ... if requested by: (1) the mayor, fire chief, fire marshall, or police chief of a municipality in which a fire occurs; (2) a county or district judge, sheriff, county fire marshal, chief or fire marshal of a fire department in an unincorporated area, or county attorney of a county in which a fire occurs; (3) a fire insurance company interested in a loss or the company's general,… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Does this one? [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
In summary, the case makes clear that, to be protected from retaliation, an employee must make a complaint to management (or a governmental agency) that: 1. identifies past conduct; 2. relates to fraud on shareholders (this is the key - it does not protect employees who complain about, say, tax fraud); 3. alleges that management had a fraudulent intent. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:42 am
H.R.5; Status. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
APPLICATION OF SECTION 106 TO FDA-REGULATED PRODUCTS.SEC. 5. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:40 pm
Neither does the last line, since nothing in this clause gives YourCo the ability to make such a demand; we’re only talking about OurCo’s demand here. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
”Defining racial discrimination under international lawArticle 1 of ICERD broadly defines “racial discrimination” as follows:1. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
” Defining racial discrimination under international law Article 1 of ICERD broadly defines “racial discrimination” as follows: 1. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:58 am
It suffices to say that we find significant consumer welfare threats from the creation of a new regulatory agency designed to impose “neutral” search results. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 5:18 am
H.R.5; Status. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:31 am
(June 1, 2009 Clause Construction Award, at pp. 3-5). [read post]
