Search for: "Doe governmental units 1-10"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2012, 3:10 am
The bill would amend title 9 of the United States Code to prohibit mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts for mobile service. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
If you call to order, please allow 7-10 days for delivery. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 543 F.3d 586, 594 (9th Cir. 2008)). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Third, under Article 1, the Convention does not apply at all if no document is to be transmitted abroad. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 3:40 am
McCrutchen, No. 10-383 (3rd Cir. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:11 am
Here’s the language proposed by Senator Leahy in context of the actual Section 926B: (c) As used in this section, the term “qualified law enforcement officer” means an employee of a governmental agency who— (1) is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of, or the incarceration of any person for, any violation of law, and has statutory powers of arrest or apprehension under section 807(b) of… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
If a group is part of the decision-making process but does not want change, the slower the process, the better. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:13 am
The bill would amend title 9 of the United States Code to prohibit mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts for mobile service. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
To permit liability based on Rule 10b5-2(b)(1) would exceed the SEC’s § 10(b) authority to proscribe conduct that is deceptive. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
Clinton (docket 10-699). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:29 pm
Whether a governmental unit is immune from liability for a particular claim depends entirely upon statute. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:58 am
But what does development mean today? [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:09 am
The bill would amend title 9 of the United States Code to prohibit mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts for mobile service. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:09 am
The bill would amend title 9 of the United States Code to prohibit mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts for mobile service. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Fletcher (1866), L.R. 1 Ex. 265, aff’d (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330 for that loss. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Part I: SLAPPS – A Weapon Against Public Participation During the 1970s SLAPPs were recognized for the first time as a legal phenomenon in the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:59 am
The Commissioner found that the exemptions for international relations (sections 27(1)(a) and 27(2)) and ministerial communications (s.35(1)(b)) applied to the information. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
Quon, the United States Supreme Court considered both of these questions. [read post]
