Search for: "Does 1-1000" Results 941 - 960 of 1,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2011, 5:14 am
The court's opinion does not explain the law behind why estoppel fails in this case, but we can look at what is sometimes termed the first maxim of equity: "Aequitas sequiture legem" - "equity follows the law". 30A C.J.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:28 am by K&L Gates
  Upon investigation, defense counsel determined that approximately 1000 pages of privileged Ryan/McKenna documents had been produced and thereafter sought their return. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 10:05 pm
The RIAA has stated that the settlements will be for a $1000 or more less than otherwise. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 5:00 pm by cwo@barkerolmsted.com
  Be sure that you check your state’s laws to determine if (1) there is a state family leave law and (2) if it provides something different than does the federal FMLA. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 2:40 pm by Denise
If you don’t know how to reach your representative, or what to say, try the following (borrowed from my friend, Phyllis): 1. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:52 am by Ted Frank
If attorneys collected $4 billion for a $30 billion settlement, that would be too high: it's not 1000 times more difficult to bring a $30 billion case than a $30 million case; meanwhile the other $3 billion from several hundred cases would result in $1 billion of fees, which is also too high. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by Steve Davies
If Congress can exempt the Tester-Simpson wolf delisting rider from judicial review, it can likewise exempt anything it does. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am by Conor McEvily
Thaler, the Court found the petitioner’s appeal untimely, holding that Section 2253(c)(3) is a mandatory but nonjurisdictional rule; that the failure of a certificate of appealability to “indicate” a constitutional issue does not deprive a court of appeals of jurisdiction to adjudicate the appeal; and that, for a state prisoner who does not seek review in a state’s highest court, the judgment becomes “final” for purposes of Section… [read post]