Search for: "Does 1-25, Inclusive"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2012, 10:05 pm
According to data on the World Federation of Exchanges website, in the ten year period between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2011, the number of companies trading on either NYSE or NASDAQ has declined by about 25% (from 6,586 to 4,900), yet in absolute terms the number of filings remains within about the same range (that is, around 200 per year). [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 3:07 pm
Excellent graph from Information is Beautiful: http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2010/how-much-do-music-artists-earn-online/comment-page-1/ “I’d rather be raped by The Pirate Bay than shafted by Hasse Breitholtz and Sony Music. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:54 am
The only criteria for inclusion is interest to this particular moggy. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:48 pm
Because while it is more complicated, it’s also more inclusive, meaning more people will find themselves approved than ever before. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:48 pm
Because while it is more complicated, it’s also more inclusive, meaning more people will find themselves approved than ever before. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
In an endorsement made on November 25, 2011, I allowed the appeal, set aside the order of the Master and stated that written reasons would follow. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:08 pm
This important file has been discussed for many years and we are now very close to a final deal, albeit only at 25. [read post]
17 May 2012, 1:04 pm
A standard does two things. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
Verdone, 2012 NY Slip Op 50728(U) (Sup Ct Suffolk County Apr. 25, 2012), a bare-knuckles contest pitting an expelled physician-shareholder of a large Long Island anesthesiology practice against the 11 other physician-shareholders. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
Verdone, 2012 NY Slip Op 50728(U) (Sup Ct Suffolk County Apr. 25, 2012), a bare-knuckles contest pitting an expelled physician-shareholder of a large Long Island anesthesiology practice against the 11 other physician-shareholders. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am
Yes, it was written a long time ago, but this certainly does not make it acceptable. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:09 pm
All investors in these funds must be (i) an accredited investor, as defined in Regulation D or (ii) a qualified client, as defined in federal regulations. [2] However, the exemption does not allow private fund managers that advise a 3(c)(1) fund to accept accredited investors who are individuals that qualify solely by the income test.[3] The inclusion of certain categories of accredited investors within 3(c)(1) funds is a… [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
PA Media Lawyer reports on a case that has established that a newspaper is not defined by what material it was printed on, “nor by shape or size” but it does have to contain news. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Information Administration (EIA) released its analysis of S.2146. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:02 am
In its latest website update, the FDIC announced that as of April 25, 2012, the agency has authorized lawsuits in connection with 58 failed institutions against 493 individuals for D&O liability, inclusive of the 29 filed D&O lawsuits naming 239 former directors and officers. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm
However, the majority judgment does not provide an explanation as to why the difference between pursuing inclusivity in higher education and implementing the right to primary education should make such a qualitative difference to the content of the right protected under Article 19(1)(g).However, this issue raises a fascinating question about the role of legislative intent in constitutional adjudication. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm
The proposed class was defined as “[a]ny and all record holders and beneficial owners of any share(s) of Celera common stock who held any such share(s) at any time [between February 3, 2010 and May 17, 2011, inclusive], but excluding the Defendants. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:10 pm
§ 343-1(a)(5). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards Observer, Clause… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:12 pm
The fact that a person might receive an incidental benefit from a contract to which he is not a party does not give that person a right to enforce the contract. [read post]
