Search for: "Does 1-25 inclusive" Results 941 - 960 of 1,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am by Soroush Seifi
A contract cannot take away this overtime pay entitlement.[6] Falconbridge does, however, reference the collective agreement when determining what a “work week” actually is, since ESA does not clearly command this aspect of the contract. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
The inclusion of not only banks but S&Ls and credit unions also diversifies the class in potentially complicating ways. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 25 July 2012, Nicola Davies J gave judgment in the case of AAA v Associated Newspapers (heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:43 pm by BuckleySandler
These and other changes in the bill are effective January 1, 2013. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:40 am by David M. Goldman
Does anyone really think that laws keep criminals and terrorist from obtaining firearms? [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
There does not seem to be much reason why the subcontractor should be bound by that guarantee. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The passage starting at page 2, line 25 states: In creating a virtual instrument, a user preferably creates a front panel or user interface panel. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to data on the World Federation of Exchanges website, in the ten year period between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2011, the number of companies trading on either NYSE or NASDAQ has declined by about 25% (from 6,586 to 4,900), yet in absolute terms the number of filings remains within about the same range (that is, around 200 per year). [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 3:07 pm by Chris Castle
Excellent graph from Information is Beautiful: http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2010/how-much-do-music-artists-earn-online/comment-page-1/ “I’d rather be raped by The Pirate Bay than shafted by Hasse Breitholtz and Sony Music. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:54 am
 The only criteria for inclusion is interest to this particular moggy. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:48 pm by Mandelman
  Because while it is more complicated, it’s also more inclusive, meaning more people will find themselves approved than ever before. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:48 pm by Mandelman
  Because while it is more complicated, it’s also more inclusive, meaning more people will find themselves approved than ever before. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm by John Steele
In an endorsement made on November 25, 2011, I allowed the appeal, set aside the order of the Master and stated that written reasons would follow. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:08 pm
This important file has been discussed for many years and we are now very close to a final deal, albeit only at 25. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Verdone, 2012 NY Slip Op 50728(U) (Sup Ct Suffolk County Apr. 25, 2012), a bare-knuckles contest pitting an expelled physician-shareholder of a large Long Island anesthesiology practice against the 11 other physician-shareholders. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Verdone, 2012 NY Slip Op 50728(U) (Sup Ct Suffolk County Apr. 25, 2012), a bare-knuckles contest pitting an expelled physician-shareholder of a large Long Island anesthesiology practice against the 11 other physician-shareholders. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am by INFORRM
Yes, it was written a long time ago, but this certainly does not make it acceptable. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:09 pm by Alexander J. Davie
 All investors in these funds must be (i) an accredited investor, as defined in Regulation D  or (ii) a qualified client, as defined in federal regulations. [2]  However, the exemption does not allow private fund managers that advise a 3(c)(1) fund to accept accredited investors who are individuals that qualify solely by the income test.[3]    The inclusion of certain categories of accredited investors within 3(c)(1) funds is a… [read post]