Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
Davis, footnote 1. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:21 pm
2024/1760 5.7.2024 DIRECTIVE (EU) 2024/1760 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (Text with EEA relevance) THE… [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 8:08 am
The new law takes effect on January 1, 2017. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 am
§ 71 allows alimony recipients to deduct legal fees under § 121(1) as an expense incurred to produce income. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:24 am
Colorado Revised Statutes Annotated section 18-1.3-401(1)(a). [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm
Ct. 2056, 2069-71 (2016) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting). [2] Whren v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
R. 1:7-4; J.A. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:05 pm
Public Health, 71 (3): 266-69 (Mar. 1981). [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 2:41 am
., Ltd. (2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Ex. 4 at 1-2). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Ex. 4 at 1-2). [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:21 am
Holding that no such duty of indemnity or contribution existed, the Court explained: “1. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
App. 3d 60, 71 (2d Dist. 1990). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
S. 63, 71 (2003).Whack.It bears repeating that even a strong case for relief does not mean the state court's contrary conclusion was unreasonable. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
· If the court considers that invalidity proceedings should be stayed, infringement should likewise be stayed; and Article 104(1) does not apply to the passing off claim, at para [55] – [58]. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
It is therefore the applicant who is entitled to file requests in grant proceedings before the EPO (see for example A 93(1)(b) (request for early publication), R 70(1) (request for examination) and R 71(4) (request for amendments)). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
The fact that the application was refused on the same ground of indefiniteness of the point of intersection must have come as a surprise to the appellant because the objection is based both on new facts (the replacement of the expression “linear object” by “thin object” in claim 1) and on new technical considerations that had not been communicated to the appellant beforehand.Therefore, the Board agrees with the appellant that the decision of the ED, insofar as it is… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Ortho Pharmaceuticals, 475 N.E.2d 65, 70-71 (Mass. 1985) (“compliance with FDA requirements, though admissible to demonstrate lack of negligence, is not conclusive on this issue, just as violation of FDA requirements is evidence, but not conclusive”); Baldino v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:57 am
(Id. art. 1-3.) [read post]
