Search for: "Edwards v. People"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2017, 3:57 am
In my view, the defendant’s ambiguous and equivocal reference to a “lawyer dog” does not constitute an invocation of counsel that warrants termination of the interview and does not violate Edwards v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:35 pm
Canada, a people’s history. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:21 am
The proceedings were anonymised as AMM v HXW ([2010] EWHC 2457 (QB)). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:53 am
Edward Trachtman, approximately 460 times in the course of about five years. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
The case was Brendlin v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 5:54 am
” Simcox v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 10:41 am
He said flatly that his studies had shown that black people and males were more likely to be a danger to the public. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 8:15 am
V). [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
The requirement to investigate does not depend on a complaint from the victim or next-of-kin: once the matter has come to the attention of the authorities they must act of their own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II). [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 1:16 pm
One example emerged in the hearings during Kitzmiller v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 12:18 pm
The style of the case is, Edward McDonald v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:22 am
Romano v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:48 am
The court ruled in 1993’s Herrera v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
We cannot accept the death of another Troy Davis or Edward Earl Johnson. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
(relisted after the April 24 conference) Edwards v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm
We had a case comment on this blog by Edward Craven and a piece by Tim Lowles. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
The Foreword, written by the Honourable Edward C. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
Facebook will also launch a new scam ads reporting tool and a dedicated team of people to act upon such reports. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
. ---------------- One reason, perhaps, for Durham’s aggressive attempt to overturn Judge Beaty’s decision came last week, when the Supreme Court considered a grand jury immunity case, Rehberg v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am
Maybe we need to balance incentives for marginal artists v. incentives for most popular, instead of incentives v. access. [read post]
