Search for: "Felts v. Felts" Results 941 - 960 of 9,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
Goleski felt he was being treated unfairly, and his suspicion of the police officer led him to refuse the breath test. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm by David Greene
Reluctantly, the district court dismissed her claims on June 6, 2014, explaining that it felt  “constrained” because of a 1979 case, Smith v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 11:54 pm by Afro Leo
In a more recent example RSA felt quite comfortable using far reaching anti-ambush marketing legislation for the the World Cup (football) that also potentially eroded freedom of expression. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:53 am by Kevin Sheerin
The Court disagreed and felt that the evidence was, in fact, sufficient and the penalty of revocation was not disproportionate to the offences committed and thus, not shocking to one’s sense of fairness. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion: Adoptive Couple v Cherokee Nation An excerpt: We do not take lightly the grave interests at stake in this case. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion: Adoptive Couple v Cherokee Nation An excerpt: We do not take lightly the grave interests at stake in this case. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:09 am
Defendant felt he had to return. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm by Kevin Sheerin
The Court felt that contrary to petitioner’s contentions, the determination was supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
It's not wrong to say that he felt strongly about particular things. [read post]
15 May 2019, 3:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Sumption dissenting felt that the rule of law was sufficiently vindicated by the judicial character of the IPT and it does not require a right of appeal from the decisions of a judicial body of this kind. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am by Jonathan Bailey
The justices in the majority clearly felt that Google was in the right but was unsure how, using the existing fair use factors and case law, to get to the desired outcome. [read post]