Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 941 - 960 of 16,009
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2010, 6:22 am by David Smith
The RPT recently dismissed a case against a managing agent on the basis that they were not liable (see Corless & Others v Citi Quays Ltd). [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:22 am by David Smith
The RPT recently dismissed a case against a managing agent on the basis that they were not liable (see Corless & Others v Citi Quays Ltd). [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 12:54 am
In doing so, she violated several executive orders and regulations of the Treasury Department and was fined $6.700. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:00 am by admin
-based defense contractor BAE Systems plc March 1 pleaded guilty to charges it bribed foreign officials to gain or retain business in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and arms control laws, agreeing to pay a staggering $400 million criminal penalty ( United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:24 pm by Patrick@nimblelight.com
Schedule III drugs are considered less dangerous, and Schedule IV and V drugs are considered to have a relatively low potential for abuse. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:21 am
Intervening in cases where they should stay out--Roe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:29 am by David Cosgrove
Last month the Supreme Court of Mississippi handed down its 6-3 split opinion in the matter of Harrington v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:00 am
Rost finding no recourse but to file a qui tam suit about illegal marketing, which has resulted in Pfizer paying a $35 million fine as well as the recent court order to allow Rost's suit to proceed, which could result in several hundred million dollars in additional fines for Pfizer? [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:30 am by Steven Buckingham
[Editor's note: This Dallas Cowboys lawsuit was of such great interest to us that we decided that both Steve Buckingham and Nick Farr, fine writers of this site, should comment upon it. [read post]