Search for: "George v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 7,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments George  v Cannell, heard on 14 June 2022 (Underhill V-P, Warby and Snowden LLJ) The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspaper [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
  George D Chryssides, Canopy Forum: Jehovah’s Witnesses and Religious Persecution: Do Signed Declarations Help? [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Nabil Shaikh
Richman noted that in Gundy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Higgins (not George Bernard Shaw’s professor of linguistics!) [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 6:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The State Legislature in Connecticut was among the public bodies that took action, resulting in this ruling that probably deserves more attention.The case is Connecticut State Police Union v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Classified as “red” were George and Elizabeth Hibbert, on account of their role as plantation owners. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  No doubt traditionalists like George Will--whom I had the pleasure of debating a couple of weeks ago about the need for constitutional reform (he's against it)--are heartbroken; devotees of the “classical game” no doubt regard the "designated hitter" as rsimilar to dipping one’s hotdog into water and separating it from the bun. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
I also reject George and Craddock's broad view of Section 5 of the 14th Amendment -- a view of Congress's power rejected by the Supreme Court in City of Boerne v. [read post]