Search for: "German v. German" Results 941 - 960 of 5,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by Andrew Hamm
For her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at the 1988 case Morrison v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm by Florian Mueller
But Nokia avers that its products only process something that can be described as pseudo-planar: instead of separate U and V planes, there's a single data block containing a pair of U and V values for each pixel. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:21 pm
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 69, no. 3, 2009) is out. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:41 pm
The next Great War: McDonald's has a go at Starbucks. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:09 am
The decision is subject to a further appeal on legal reasons to the German Federal Court of Justice. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 9:15 am
Compare other more or less imitative verbs with final -ump , e.g. bump v.1, dump v.1, stump v.1, thump v., etc. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:06 am by Eleonora Rosati
 The issues at the centre of these important referrals - on which see at greater length here and here - revolve around the key issue of whether platforms which make available user-uploaded content perform an act of communication to the public under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive.Other issues include:The availability of the hosting safe harbour in Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive to platforms which communicate to the publicInjunctions under Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc… [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 5:49 am by Magdaleen Jooste
The High Court decision in Illumina v MGI hit the IP headlines for its application of the Supreme Court decision in Regeneron v Kymab. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 12:38 pm by Florian Mueller
ZTEMaurits Dolmans, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton: The proportionality requirement under the EU enforcement directive (with certain references to the German injunction reform debate)Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
The board’s claim construction and motivation to combine analysis were supported by the record (Shamoon v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
(German Court determines the limits of private copying). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:31 am by Tobias Thienel
By Tobias ThienelThis morning, 11 years and one day after 9/11, the European Court of Human Rights has delivered its judgment in Nada v Switzerland. [read post]