Search for: "German v. State"
Results 941 - 960
of 3,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
Mordenti v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
Instead, MSD submitted, with their SPC application, a copy of the end of procedure (EoP) notice from the German medicines agency stating that the DCP had ended with approval. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
For example, the complaint alleges that “the challenged provisions of SB 94 as applied by the State Bar…” … unconstitutionally infringe upon the rights of Plaintiff, other members of the State Bar and citizens of California seeking legal representation under Article I, Section l0 of the United States Constitution, which states that no State shall pass any law “impairing the Obligation of Contracts. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 5:27 pm
Luxshare Ltd. and AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
Qualcomm's Mannheim Steamroller is stuttering: patents too young to defeat Apple in tech-savvy court
3 Oct 2018, 11:22 am
The first Qualcomm v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:20 am
The first case (Axel Springer v Germany (App No 39954/08)) concerned media reports about a famous German TV personality who had been arrested for allegedly having used cocaine. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:36 pm
There simply is no way to reconcile FCC v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 4:39 am
He noted that a plain reading of the requirement was contrary to the company’s interpretation, and he rejected its argument that the First Circuit case of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
Innovator v Innovator - does this matter where injunctions are concerned? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:11 pm
Building upon our prior opinion in Jaubert v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am
C v C (Ancillary Relief: Nuptial Settlement) [2004] EWCA Civ 1030, [2005] Fam 250, at para 31. 104. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm
In the United States, the Second Circuit in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
’ (quoting Pure Power Boot Camp v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
The only European authority on "staple commercial products" cited was a Patents County Court decision in Pavel v Sony Corporation where HHJ Ford stated that a "staple commercial product is a commodity or raw material". [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:48 pm
THE VOTE - has the decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly improved the law? [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm
The warning follows yesterday’s cyberattack on a German telecommunications company as well as German accusations that Russians attacked the computer systems of two of the country’s political parties. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156 considered the constitutionality of the prohibition under Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 on bringing a kirpan into a school. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
In Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Last week IPKat was also delighted to host a guest post from Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge) on the state of the debate around the proposed EU press publishers’ right: Sleepwalking towards a perpetual (news?) [read post]
