Search for: "Graves v. United States"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2023, 3:31 pm
In Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am
In a mundane lens, this is a somewhat unsurprising application of the notoriously conservative Article 42.5 test refined in the “PKU” case, North Western Health Board v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:51 am
Nevertheless, the lower federal courts in the United States have repeatedly held that financial hardship on the part of the plaintiff is not enough to make an otherwise valid forum selection clause unenforceable. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
In the United Kingdom and other Council of Europe member states, following the 1981 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Dudgeon v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:31 am
And if it’s true that he was in the program, then the very fact that he is living now under his real name in his home state seems to suggest that there is no “clear and present danger of grave physical harm” to him. 2. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:27 pm
Medellin’s execution could have grave consequences for Americans abroad. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:07 am
Currently, Title 42 United States Code Section 264 charges the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with "preventing the introduction, transmission, and spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the United States and within the United States and its territories/possessions. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am
United States, the justices will decide if Idaho’s Defense of Life Act is “pre-empted,” or blocked, because it conflicts with the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 1:12 pm
United States strengthens the case against Trump's sweeping use of Section 212(f)—here and here: Trump v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:56 am
In the words of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am
Cal.) in Weiss v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am
We reject that result because the United States Constitution cannot properly be so interpreted. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 2:49 pm
This is a grave violation of religious freedom and cannot stand. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
The Court in Laird v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am
At Cato@Liberty, Trevor Burrus predicts that the Court will summarily reverse the Montana Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the state’s ban on independent expenditures by corporations – a ruling that Burrus calls an attempt to “nullify” Citizens United. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:55 pm
Sosa v. [read post]
