Search for: "Habeas Corpus Cases" Results 941 - 960 of 4,148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2017, 6:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Inmates are looking to get out of jail, and a good habeas corpus petition can get you there. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
Bush in 2008 extending the constitutional right of habeas corpus to the foreign nationals that the U.S. was then holding (and scores of whom it still holds) at the military prison at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:15 am by Peter Margulies
 (Limits on judicial review for this group of noncitizens might also clash with the Suspension Clause's guarantee of access to habeas corpus.) [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 12:20 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The habeas corpus "fast track" regulations were held up for over three years by order of a judge with no jurisdiction in a case steered to her in exactly that manner.Congress should take a hard look at the rules regarding venue in cases that seek nationwide injunctions. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:47 pm by John Floyd
  Previous Probation Revoked for Crime of Improper Visual Photography   In the wake of Thompson, Lea promptly filed two post-conviction applications for habeas corpus relief. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:11 am by Paul Cassell
The Ninth Circuit ordered the district court to vacate and reenter its initial judgment denying Washington’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus solely for the purpose of avoiding jurisdictional deadlines. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:00 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Bush that non-citizens detained by the United States in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, had a constitutional right under the Suspension Clause to seek a writ of habeas corpus in U.S. courts. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
The quoted case descriptions are from Westlaw, except where described as quotations from Gorsuch. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:29 am by Peter Margulies
Bush, holding that Congress could not deprive Guantanamo detainees of access to habeas corpus. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:09 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  They are not, and such second-guessing on close questions is not the proper purpose of habeas corpus. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
These stark realities are met by the suggestion that it is lawful to compel an American citizen to submit to illegal imprisonment on the assumption that he might, after going to the Assembly Center, apply for his discharge by suing out a writ of habeas corpus, as was done in the Endo case, supra. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
These stark realities are met by the suggestion that it is lawful to compel an American citizen to submit to illegal imprisonment on the assumption that he might, after going to the Assembly Center, apply for his discharge by suing out a writ of habeas corpus, as was done in the Endo case, supra. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Yet those of us who study and practice in the area of federal habeas corpus realize that the real question is not whether a defendant can be put to death because of his lawyer’s incompetence. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 11:03 am by Quinta Jurecic
This leaves Abu Zubaydah’s habeas case. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:19 pm by Amy Howe
Many of the death penalty cases in which he has participated involve applications of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, a 1996 federal law that imposes both procedural and substantive limitations on an inmate’s ability to obtain habeas corpus relief from his conviction. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 1:11 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
In yesterday's Undisclosed episode, we noted how the defense team filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the Joey Watkins case. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 2:06 pm by Amy Howe
Roberts posited that they could bring habeas corpus actions in federal court, arguing that they were being detained in violation of the Constitution. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Habeas corpus petitions are routinely denied by the federal courts because Congress in 1996 told them to defer to the constitutional judgments reached by the state appellate courts. [read post]