Search for: "Hand v. Scott"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 9:16 pm
Pa. 1990); Scott Paper Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
This said, [para 81] "there has been very little consideration in any of the case law of what amounts to "reporting" a current event", although in BBC v BSB [para 82] Scott J held also news of a sporting character could fall within the scope of the defence.(3) Fair dealingIn Ashdown [one of the key cases on defences under UK law] Lord Phillips noted the impossibility of laying down "any hard-and-fast definition of what is fair dealing, for it is… [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
Last Friday, in an extra session, the justices handed down decisions in three more cases. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
Ben-Tzvi v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:15 pm
V. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm
This problem, at least in part, appears to have been recognised by the House of Lords in Fourie v Le Roux [2007] UKHL 1 where Lord Scott of Foscote said:“I think it needs to be understood that the difference between costs at the standard rate and costs on an indemnity basis is, according to the language of the relevant rules, not very great. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 5:15 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 6:56 am
Scott J. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:02 am
A lawsuit filed in Payne v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
David v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:08 am
In Comcast v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:48 am
In Watts v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 3:30 am
Scott, which completely blows out of the water the argument I’ve been making for the last ten minutes. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 4:40 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am
Brief for Appellant, Reed v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
Scott (1978) 21 Cal.3d 284, 296.) [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
External regulation will be handed to Ofcom. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:34 pm
From Westenbroek v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:48 am
" But Nussbaum criticized Posner for forgetting these insights in the later case of Baskerville v Culligan International Co (which, for simplicity's sake, could essentially be renamed Pam Beesly v Michael Scott). [read post]
