Search for: "Housing Authority v. City Council"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,015
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
Newport City Council v Charles [2008] EWCA Civ 1541, The Times, 11 Aug 2008 The transcript for this (factually remarkable but legally straightforward) case has only just been produced, hence the delay in covering it. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
Newport City Council v Charles [2008] EWCA Civ 1541, The Times, 11 Aug 2008 The transcript for this (factually remarkable but legally straightforward) case has only just been produced, hence the delay in covering it. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:24 am
Leicester City Council v Masters LRX/175/2007 (links to a .pdf) Pursuant to the Right to Buy provisions, the respondent purchased a leasehold interest in his flat in April 2005. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
In this case upheld the authority of Congress to create the Bank of the United States.Cohens v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:49 pm
Kelly v Westminster City Council (Central London County Court 14 August 2008). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
This delegation of the City council’s authority constituted an impermissible attempt to approve the project without CEQA review. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 10:41 am
Ali v Birmingham City Council; Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1228; [2008] WLR (D) 349 “A local housing authority’s discharge of its statutory duty to rehouse a homeless person in priority need where that person had refused an offer of suitable accommodation could not be challenged other than by administrative review subject appeal to the county court, which was the equivalent of judicial… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
Anyway, on to Ali & Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA 1228. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:29 am
Birmingham City Council v (1) Shafi (2) Ellis [2008] EWCA Civ 1186 This is a complicated case, focusing much more on local government law than on housing law per se, but there are some significant implications for housing lawyers. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 7:57 pm
Gun rights advocates in the House and outside were upset by the City Council’s first measure adopted after the Supreme Court in District of Coumbia v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:07 am
Doherty v Birmingham City Council House of Lords “Although the definition of a ‘protected site’ in section 5(1) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983, in excluding Gypsies from the protection of that Act, was incompatible with an occupier's right to respect for his home in article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, incompatible primary legislation had to be enforced and an occupier's defence to a local… [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:45 pm
But the City Council never did that. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
R (on the application of M) (FC) (Respondent) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52 is a House of Lords case concerning Local Authority obligations under the National Assistance Act 1948, and specifically when the authority is obliged to arrange and pay for accommodation. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
So, Doherty (FC) (Appellant) and others v Birmingham City Council (Respondent) [2008] UK HL 57 Well, well, and once more for effect, well. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:45 pm
I’m not doing reports but the cases are: Liverpool City Council, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon [2008] EWHC 1702 (Admin) on when and more specifically where a local authority’s duty to a ‘vulnerable young person’ arise under Children Act 1989. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:20 pm
The House of Lords had in effect approved McLellan in Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] 2 AC 465. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
Moreover, the relationship between Claimant and LQHT was contractual, which was at the core of R v Servite Houses, ex p Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55, as approved in YL v Birmingham City Council [2007] 3 WLR 112. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
Moreover, the relationship between Claimant and LQHT was contractual, which was at the core of R v Servite Houses, ex p Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55, as approved in YL v Birmingham City Council [2007] 3 WLR 112. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
City Council would do well to re-write its machine gun ban so that it applies only to real machine guns. [read post]
