Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 1,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Antonia Gold, Olswang LLP
Supreme Court decision Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes agreed, gave the judgment of the court. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
 The question is not whether some readers would have misunderstood the satire as stating facts but whether the average or reasonable reader would have come to that view. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:25 pm by Steve Vladeck
As we suggested in our preview of Tuesday’s oral argument in Ross v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Further, state law could allow a corporation to indemnify a director or officer. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am by Family Law Attorneys
The order specifically stated that the trial court did not rely on Dr. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:58 am by The Federalist Society
On February 24, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the consolidated cases Hughes v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 11:24 am by Zack Bluestone
On Wednesday, the United States and the European Union warned Beijing that it must respect the upcoming merits decision in the Philippines v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   In the same way, Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in his dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm by The Blog Team
Correction of judgment and restitution: “There is something very wrong with this picture – so wrong Stevie Wonder could see the flaw from a phone booth in Chicago:” United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm by Old Fox
Cranmer accepted a commission to write a propaganda treatise in the king’s interest, stating the course he proposed and defending it by arguments from Scripture, the Fathers, and the decrees of general councils. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:24 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Next Wednesday, February 24, the Justices will once again examine the regulatory realms of national and state officials, in the combined cases of Hughes v. [read post]