Search for: "IN RE VIOLATION OF RULE 50" Results 941 - 960 of 2,321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2015, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
They are concerning, but not enough to violate the law. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This means that the employer not only has paid the less senior individual that it retained in the position in violation of the “seniority in layoff rules,” it typically must also reinstate the more senior individual to his or her former position with back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This means that the employer not only has paid the less senior individual that it retained in the position in violation of the “seniority in layoff rules,” it typically must also reinstate the more senior individual to his or her former position with back salary and benefits. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am by Wim Alberts
”  (Islamic Unity Convention v Independent Broadcasting Authority [2002] ZACC 3 paragraph 50). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
The soiled laundry was aired in an uncomfortable Senate trial, climaxing in a more comfortable acquittal for President Clinton, on votes of 50-50 (on the charge of perjury) and 45-55 (on obstruction of justice). [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 8:00 am by Beck, et al.
  If they're not, we'll live by the rules, but we'll certainly not be content.For similar reasons, we’re also reasonably happy with the recent decision in In Re: Ortho Evra Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1742, slip op. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:37 am by Leland Garvin
Under the bill, violating rules on boating under the influence, unsafe navigation, expired registration, damaging seagrass, and anchoring in prohibited areas would result in higher non-criminal fines (from $50 to $100). [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:37 am by Leland Garvin
Under the bill, violating rules on boating under the influence, unsafe navigation, expired registration, damaging seagrass, and anchoring in prohibited areas would result in higher non-criminal fines (from $50 to $100). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:47 pm
Souter remarked near the end of the hearing: "We have had a debate here for going on 50 minutes about what Tinker means, about the proper charaterization of the behavior, the non-speech behavior. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:27 pm by Kathleen Rudis
  In late 2009, in In re Marriage of Tara Ranzy and Larissa Chism, the Marion County Superior Court denied the divorce of two women married in Canada, concluding it would violate Indiana law. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 4:16 am
The 28% of employers who have fired workers for e-mail misuse did so for the following reasons:Cops violation of any company policy (64%); inappropriate or offensive language (62%); excessive personal use (26%); breach of confidentiality rules (22%); other (12%). [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
With the ruling in Cyan, other state courts will be opening their doors for IPO-suits. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 8:31 am by David Oxenford and Adam Sandler
  As a party seeking to invoke the rule needed to show that a site was unique, and as the rule could only be invoked to deny the license renewal of the licensee of a station controlling a unique site and blocking its competitive use, the FCC has never found that a licensee violated its provisions. [read post]