Search for: "JOHN DOES, 1-3" Results 941 - 960 of 8,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2009, 12:57 am
Chrysler does not deserve aid until it can present compelling new-generation vehicles. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-4December 9, 2008, decision, granting ex parte discovery motion, and sua sponte severing as to all John Does other than John Doe #1 (Also at : 2008 U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Josh Blackman
In October 2021, Justice Barrett wrote her influential concurrence in John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:26 pm
Most of those are trivial or minor, but some are major, such as in the case of John 7:53-8:11, which does not appear in several manuscripts. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
The BIA noted that respondent failed to establish a prima facie claim for U-nonimmigrant status warranting a continuance given his failure to show that (1) a U-Visa had been filed with USCIS, (2) the form was prima facie approvable, or that (3) a law enforcement agency would sign off on the Supplement B law enforcement certification. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
The BIA noted that respondent failed to establish a prima facie claim for U-nonimmigrant status warranting a continuance given his failure to show that (1) a U-Visa had been filed with USCIS, (2) the form was prima facie approvable, or that (3) a law enforcement agency would sign off on the Supplement B law enforcement certification. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:43 pm
Two sub-questions follow: (1) how does that embedding shape the character of social credit ‘as’ or ‘in’ the cage of regulation through which the rule of law structures of Chinese constitutionalism are ordered; and (2) in what ways does the implementation of social credit through platforms change or displace traditional forms of the administration of law. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 2:45 am by Miquel Montañá
Clearly, a “Notice” from the Commission, which does not even bind the Commission – as the Notice itself alerts – does not seem to be the right instrument to enlighten the examining divisions of a different international organization (i.e. the European Patent Organization) on how they must interpret the provisions of the EPC. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:57 pm by Steven G. Pearl
"   The employee in an age discrimination case makes a prima facie case of disparate treatment “by demonstrating that he was (1) at least forty years old, (2) performing his job satisfactorily, (3) discharged, and (4) either replaced by substantially younger employees with equal or inferior qualifications or discharged under circumstances otherwise ‘giving rise to an inference of discrimination. [read post]