Search for: "John Doe et al"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Winter was coming, as it does. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:05 am
State of California, et al., U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:26 pm
However, as Tompros et al. point out, in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing there was a good deal of false information spreading on various social media platforms, but using those very same platforms, the Boston Police Department ("BPD") quickly refuted and corrected the misinformation. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:43 pm
Huber et al (CAFC 2009-1566) precedential; Judges Linn (author), Plager (dissent-in-part) and Dyk Appellees Finance Express, John Doe Dealers, and RouteOne (collectively, "Appellees") filed four summary judgment motions1: (1) non-infringement of all asserted claims of the '841 Patent based on the absence of a "com-munications medium," as construed by the district court, in the accused devices and based on several other proposed claim… [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 4:21 am
Rees, Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Corrections, et al. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
Halliburton Co., et al., Dkt. [read post]
3 May 2017, 12:32 pm
Scout Petroleum LLC et al., Case No. 4:14-CV-0620 (M.D. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:43 pm
Steele, et al., No. 27-CV-13-3463 (Minn. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 12:11 pm
See John Kimpflen, et al., 52B C.J.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 9:57 am
Indeed, as Grits surely has no qualms about applying math to data, much of 21st century economists' work on justice topics may escape my criticisms of Becker, et. al., above.The greater problem with applied math in the criminal-justice realm is the data to which said math is applied. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:26 am
Jarrell et al., The Market for Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence Since 1980, 2 J. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
” Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre Gmbh, et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:42 am
., et al., 2010 WL 743834 (M.D. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 12:04 pm
Brennan et al. are not oblivious to considerations of risk and would insist that the government should reimburse pharmaceutical companies for their risk-adjusted R&D. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Rico Perez Products (2-CA-37882, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 43) Miami, FL, Brooklyn, NY, and Elizabeth, NJ Oct. 31, 2008. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
Dahl, et al., Science, 2003, 299, 96-99. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Roy Defries, M.D., et al. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
Regatta AS et al. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
In Reichle, et al., v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
On Monday, the Court relisted in five new cases. [read post]
