Search for: "Judicial Review Council" Results 941 - 960 of 4,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2021, 9:25 am by Robbie Stern
In a particularly damning passage, Haddon-Cave LJ noted [76]: In my view, it was not appropriate for the SSHD simply to sit back and assert her right to impose restrictions on SM in the face of the FTT’s extant bail order, thereby requiring the claimant after several months to have to resort to judicial review proceedings. [read post]
16 May 2021, 9:56 am by SW
Birmingham had agreed to review the allocations scheme, so it was not certain that the Court could have granted much by way of relief if this ground had been successful. [read post]
10 May 2021, 8:45 am
Today's DJ has Justice Richard Aronson will retire from 4th District, which notes:Aronson’s departure will leave the state appellate courts with nine vacancies, according to the Judicial Council’s monthly Judicial Vacancy reports, the highest number in three years.Also: “After over 30 years on the bench and well over 20 years in the court of appeals as both a research attorney and justice, I thought it was time,” Aronson said Friday. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am by INFORRM
The article coincides with Paraguay’s Universal Periodic Review at the UN Human Rights Council, which presents an important opportunity for UN member states and civil society to examine Paraguay’s human rights record, and make recommendations for how to improve it. ● The Human Rights Watch Film Festival  kicks off online on May 19 and runs until May 27, streaming across the US. [read post]
7 May 2021, 8:53 am by Monica Williamson
  Provide judicial services for the Band’s tribal court. [read post]
5 May 2021, 10:01 am by Monica Williamson
  Provide judicial services for the Band’s tribal court. [read post]
3 May 2021, 2:12 pm by William Ford, Tia Sewell
The committee will hear from James-Christian Blockwood, executive vice president of Partnership for Public Service; Elizabeth Hempowicz, director of public policy at Project on Government Oversight, Rudy Mehrbani, senior advisor of Democracy Fund; and Zack Smith, legal fellow in the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
An August 2019 review identified 88 direct-to-public legal tech tools operating in Canada. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am by Eugene Volokh
I think this is a classic prior restraint; in January, the Ohio Supreme Court agreed to review it. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 7:51 am by Mark MacCarthy, Kenneth Propp
 And the newly required conformity assessments turn out to be merely internal processes, not documents that could be reviewed by the public or a regulator. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm by Patricia Hughes
Under section 3 of Bill 21, “State laicity requires parliamentary, government and judicial institutions to comply with all the principles listed in section 2, in fact and in appearance, in pursuing their missions. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 12:06 pm by Stuart Kaplow
A person who meets the requirements to intervene under the bills has the same rights as an interested person or aggrieved party under CWA, including the right to apply for judicial appeal. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The few rights which have been judicially recognized by the High Court of Australia have typically been narrowly interpreted. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
In addition, a quasi-judicial control body has been created, called the Independent Control Council, which consists of six members selected from among experienced members of the Federal Court of Justice or the Constitutional Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:11 pm
Ramcharan Ronald Bettauer, reviewing Negotiating Civil War: The Politics of International Regime Design, by Henry Lovat Salvatore Caserta, reviewing International Judicial Review: When Should International Courts Intervene? [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:18 pm by Ronald Mann
Sotomayor’s opinion starts by noting that “[a]dministrative review schemes commonly require parties to give the agency an opportunity to address an issue before seeking judicial review of that question,” and emphasizes that those requirements “[t]ypically … are creatures of statute or regulation. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 10:38 am by Derek T. Muller
By my count, Iowa’s law offers at least 17 weeks of increased efficiency over Minnesota’s at a bare minimum—by constraining the certification deadline, fixing the time to compose the court, and eliminating a second level of judicial review, Iowa’s contest court procedure offers far more efficiencies.Now, it’s entirely plausible, I think, to consider extending the timeline a couple of weeks, for congressional elections (not presidential elections). [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 8:54 am by Monica Williamson
Where time allows, the attorney will represent the Tribe in other matters that require the Legal Department’s attention, including code review and drafting, litigation, contract review, and employment matters. [read post]