Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 941 - 960
of 40,594
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court explained in Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:36 am
The recent jury verdict in Menninger v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:36 am
The recent jury verdict in Menninger v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:56 pm
§ 252.204-7012 (often referred to as the “DFARS Cyber Clause” or “DFARS 7012 Clause”)Emergency ServicesAny entity that provides one or more of the following emergency services or functions to a population of 50,000 or more individuals: (i) law enforcement, (ii) fire and rescue, (iii) emergency medical services, (iv) emergency management, or (v) public works that contribute to public health and safetyEnergyAny entity required to report cybersecurity incidents… [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm
Then, in 2016, largely based on evidence that had been available to the agency for decades, EPA announced the results of its long-overdue study on ETO. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 9:20 am
Case Citation: Diep v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:53 am
While I agree with the Fifth Circuit that it is largely locked into the existing precedent in cases like Arizona v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:56 am
In Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:15 am
In King v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Royce v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:12 am
The last episode of this story is the judgment delivered by the General Court on 21 February 2024 in Case T-361/21, Papouis Dairies Ltd (and others) v the European Commission. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
In Texas Bankers Association v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:05 pm
I last attended oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the Trump v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:02 pm
The problem is that figure counts every subsidiary of every large corporation that filed chapter 11. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 1:31 pm
In Snyder v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am
In short, the Court upheld the High Court's finding, largely on the basis that it was correct to find that, where objective circumstances give rise to a prima facie case of bad faith (e.g. because there had been no use of the Wordless Mark, and it had been applied for in order to obtain a wider scope of protection than that conferred to the Mark with Text), the evidential burden of proof shifts to the applicant. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am
No doubt this is largely due to standing. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
² Sutton v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
² Sutton v. [read post]