Search for: "Label v Label" Results 941 - 960 of 13,299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Mykhailo Soldatenko
Last December marked the 28th anniversary of the Budapest Memorandum, in which the United States, the United Kingdom, and Russia provided security commitments to Ukraine in exchange for the latter joining the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a non-nuclear state. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Many cases were brought by record labels suing on behalf of Black musicians. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Legal formalism: this might not be the right label, it might be more rules v. standards. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:09 am by Don Asher
   Here, tags, labels, signs, and more are used with large “Danger” warnings using bright colors and large fonts. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm by David Post
[Not the political kind, the real kind, the stuff you get from pigs] The Supreme Court has a pretty interesting, and potentially very important, "dormant commerce clause" case before it this term—National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
 Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:57 am by Kate Fort
One of our charts still needs a labels fix from our data expert, Alicia Summers, but otherwise the article has undergone peer review and will be published soon. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Wrote a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department court in reinstating Chontay Kirby’s first and only cause of action for discrimination in her 11-page complaint, “Although plaintiff’s first cause of action is labeled as one for ‘hostile workplace,’” the lower court “was not bound by that designation and plaintiff has sufficiently stated a cause of action for employment discrimination under both the New York State and New… [read post]