Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 941 - 960
of 8,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2010, 8:03 am
The definitive case on this is King v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:03 am
The definitive case on this is King v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
While counsel, judges, law Lords, and lay Lords made arguments for and against the existence of common law copyright, the House of Lords decision in Donaldson v Becket did not definitely resolve the controversy one way or another. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
(Opinion by Lazarus).In its December 9, 2013 "Non-precedential" Opinion issued in the case of Jacoby v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
(Opinion by Lazarus).In its December 9, 2013 "Non-precedential" Opinion issued in the case of Jacoby v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:20 pm
Waldrip v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:58 am
This month the Texas Supreme Court refused to hear the case of Lindemann Properties, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:00 pm
Three updates in Aamer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
Tweet Tags: First Amendment, labor unions, Supreme CourtGuest post, “Harris v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:35 pm
US v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
In Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 4:15 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 2:17 pm
"The affirmation of plaintiff's counsel did not lay a sufficient foundation to establish that what counsel represented to be plaintiff's claim form was admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see CPLR 4518; Midborough Acupuncture, P.C. v New York Cent. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
Adrian CrespoIn preliminary injunction proceedings, the Barcelona Court of Appeal (Section 15) ruled on the interpretation of the wording “protected by a basic patent” in Article 3.a) of the SPC Regulation, on the same facts decided by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales in the 2018 judgment in Teva v Gilead and, following the criteria set out by the Court of Justice of the European Union (also in the Teva v Gilead case), arrived at the same conclusion. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
Lewallen v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm
A 5th Circuit Court of Appeals brief for a trademark infringement case between General Mills and Frito Lay over product names (Cheerios vs. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:39 pm
The book takes into account the lay reader, breaking down technical terms into easily understandable, if imprecise, ideas. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:11 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
The judge did not have to determine the lower limit of that range provided that he was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that 8 + 6 q3w lay within it. [read post]
