Search for: "Lee v. Lee"
Results 941 - 960
of 7,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2013, 11:14 am
Case Name: MATTHEW OLIVER LEE v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 8:51 am
Lee, 2008 Wash. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:55 pm
Lee eds., Forthcoming 2023)) on SSRN. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:06 am
Welcome Lee! [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:20 am
On June 16, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:20 am
On June 16, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
”—United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:30 pm
Theresa Lee has posted this draft on SSRN. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:48 am
” Pfizer v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:17 am
by Lee DavisUnited States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
Lee and MCM v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:46 am
LEE NATERS, __ N.J. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
This was the issue in Burgueno v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:05 am
As previously reported, last month in Garcia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:54 pm
The case is titled American Dairy Queen Corporation and DQF, Inc., v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:34 am
Fortunately, the Ninth Circuit gets the result correct in this case. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 1:42 am
Failure to provide a conditionally discharged restricted patient with a full explanation of the decision to recall him into detention within 72 hours of the recall date will not render the detention unlawful, nor will it give rise to a claim for damages in common law or under section 8 of the Human Rights Act. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:28 am
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 553 The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the appellant’s appeal, in a case which considered the lawfulness of the decision of the Secretary of State for Justice to recall the appellant, after he had been conditionally discharged from hospital following detention as a result of his being made a subject of a “hospital order” under the Mental Health Act 1983. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 7:51 am
Criminal Procedure — Joint defendants — Severance In this consolidated appeal, appellants, Daniel James, Cory Knight, and Antonio McClennon, challenge their convictions for first-degree and second-degree assault, armed carjacking, carjacking, conspiracy to commit armed carjacking, and use of handgun in the commission of a felony. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:15 am
On appeal from: [2016] NICA 39 This appeal considered whether the appellants directly discriminated against a customer, the respondent, on the grounds of sexual orientation, contrary to the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations (NI) 2006, and religious and political belief contrary to the Fair Employment and Treatment (NI) Order 1988, by refusing to make a cake decorated with the words ‘Support Gay Marriage’. [read post]
