Search for: "Lee v. State Bar"
Results 941 - 950
of 950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
Judge Lee Rudofsky (E.D. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
" Pucci v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
Warren is Lee Schubert; and, in all likelihood, Bedoya will continue to work in this town. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
