Search for: "Lloyd v. Lloyd" Results 941 - 960 of 2,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Lloyd, the defendant pled to a variety of theft offenses. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:07 am by Vassilis Mavrakis
The balance of the risk was underwritten by various Lloyd’s syndicates under a second policy governed by English law (“Lloyd’s Policy”). [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 3:24 am by James Scott
Reported cases suggest that in most straightforward crossing situations, the stand-on vessel which has failed to navigate in accordance with these rules, will usually bear in the region of 20% to 30% of the blame: see for example: The Topaz [2003] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 18; The Lok Vivek and Common Venture [1995] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 230; The Angelic Spirit [1994] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 595. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:51 pm by Jan Neels
In Lloyd’s v Classic Sailing Adventures (Pty) Ltd 2010 ZASCA 89 (31 May 2010) (available from www.justice.gov.za/sca) the South African Supreme Court of Appeal held that sections 53 and 54 of the South African Short-Term Insurance Act 53 of 1998 are rules of immediate application that cannot be excluded by a choice of law. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 10:30 pm by Donald Dinnie
  That is consistent with the approach of the court in Standard Life Assurance v Ace European Group2012 Lloyds Rep 655 where the court said the phrase “in connection with” is extremely broad and indicates that it is not necessary to show a direct cause or relationship between the claims and the state of affairs identified as their “originating cause or source”. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:28 am
Lord Justice Longmore and Lady Justice Arden, with the majority view (Lord Justice Lloyd dissenting), distinguished Sephton as the case in hand was not one of mere contingent liability as there was an additional measurable relevant loss on the inception of the policies as any valuation of the policies at that time would have to take into account the fact that there had been no proper vetting. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:07 pm
Hungarian International Benk, [1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 194, Egyptian International v. [read post]