Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 941 - 960
of 21,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:26 am
United States continued yesterday. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:52 pm
Citing to United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:24 pm
But there's a little known codicil of Title 31 that allows the United States to open up virtually anything, without any reason -- and certainly FedEx packages -- as long as they're ostensibly looking for currency violations. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 11:29 am
” Double Eagle Energy Services, L.L.C. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
” If enacted, such a legislative reform would bring the statute into alignment with the 2010 decision of the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am
On July 7, 2011, the Humane Society of the United States and United Egg Producers announced that they would “work together to seek a federal law that would require larger cages and other improved conditions for the nation’s 280 million laying hens. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 2:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Both of these questions were settled long ago. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
See [United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Long 2014-Ohio-849 (2014) (a court must separately consider youth of a juvenile offender as a mitigating factor before imposing a sentence of life without parole) State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:59 am
That clause holds: “[N]o State . . . shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
In the recent case of West v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
In the recent case of West v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
