Search for: "MARTINEZ v. STATE"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:16 am
The style of the case is, State Farm Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 4:00 pm
Descarga el documento: United States of America v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 4:20 pm
Lower courts considering this issue have held that an earlier Supreme Court ruling, Martinez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:53 pm
Martinez/em/liliJoseph A. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:53 pm
Martinez/em/liliJoseph A. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Frye, Martinez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:38 am
An even gloomier portent for the government is the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Pennsylvania State Supreme CourtWebb v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Juliana v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 8:24 pm
In Pioneer Tower Owners Assn. v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 8:35 am
United States v Martinez-Gonzalez, 686 F2d 93. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
Where emotional or other nonpecuniary loss is a direct result of a defendant's breach of duty, a plaintiff may recover damages for such loss (see generally Martinez v Long Is. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:51 am
Checking for intoxication at roadside stops became legal after the 1975 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
In Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
” State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
Martinez (2010). [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Martinez, 690 F.3d 1083 (U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
Plaintiff’s signed agreement with the nonparty funder, selling a portion of his interest in any potential future litigation proceeds, “conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claim as a matter of law,” as it shows that defendants did not commit any misconduct by failing to warn plaintiff of the terms of the agreement (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]), which plaintiff admittedly signed (see VXI Lux Holdco S.A.R.L.… [read post]
