Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 941 - 960 of 5,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 11:55 am by Claudia Gorham
  "The District's stubborn adherence to a pretrial settlement offer that barely exceeded its own expert's appraisal was unreasonable as a matter of law. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Braga, Northeastern University, and Philip J. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Oklahoma in its code and in the case of In the Matter of Baby Boy L.[28] and South Dakota in the case of Matter of Adoption of Baade[29]. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a result, on May 13, 2022, petitioner sent an email stating that it was appealing OCA's constructive denial, and on May 27, 2022, OCA constructively denied that appeal by failing to respond within the 10 business days permitted under Public Officers Law § 89(4)(b). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a result, on May 13, 2022, petitioner sent an email stating that it was appealing OCA's constructive denial, and on May 27, 2022, OCA constructively denied that appeal by failing to respond within the 10 business days permitted under Public Officers Law § 89(4)(b). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:59 pm by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KZ3410 .A44 2014Karen J. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:53 pm by Dan Michaluk
McLachlin C.J.C. and Abella J. wrote for the Court. [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:05 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The subject matter, land, is, after all, both very important and limited. [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:05 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The subject matter, land, is, after all, both very important and limited. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this regard the Board points out that this wording of R 36(1) EPC is identical to the wording of the former R 25(1) EPC 1973 and, therefore, the corresponding case law can be taken into account.[6] The present Board agrees with the statement of the Legal Board of Appeal in decision J 18/04 that the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 25 EPC 1973 did not establish a time limit having a point in time at which the pending status of an application begins and… [read post]