Search for: "MATTER OF J C B" Results 941 - 960 of 3,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2019, 6:16 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings The cost basis of property transferred at death receives a “step-up” in basis to its fair market value. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Now it seems to me that there is no First Amendment exception for speech that the judge views as being "born out of a vendetta," or even as "seeking to cause mental distress"; but even to the extent there are exceptions for, say, defamation, or true threats, or perhaps even speech on matters of private concern that's "extreme and outrageous" and intended to cause severe emotional distress, that can't justify an overbroad, categorical "shall… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
“Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know” Alan Ackerman, Esq. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
The EDPB recognizes that requiring another specific legal ground for secondary use would be contrary to the presumption of compatibility provided by Article 5(1)(b) of the GDPR. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
Côté J. reinforced her reputation as the great dissenter. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by Heather Donkers
Furthermore, the inclusion of paragraphs (b) and (c) in s. 162(1) indicates that Parliament understood that a person could have a reasonable expectation of privacy somewhere other than in a place where nudity or explicit sexual activity can reasonably be expected or is in fact taking place. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by Heather Donkers
Furthermore, the inclusion of paragraphs (b) and (c) in s. 162(1) indicates that Parliament understood that a person could have a reasonable expectation of privacy somewhere other than in a place where nudity or explicit sexual activity can reasonably be expected or is in fact taking place. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 6:08 am by Jessica Kroeze
Their admittance was therefore at the board's discretion (Article 13(1) and (3) RPBA).2.2 When exercising their discretion to admit late-filed requests into the proceedings, in particular requests filed after arrangement of oral proceedings, the boards of appeal take into account in particular whether the proposed amendments do not introduce new objections (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 8th ed., IV.E.4.1.3, second paragraph).2.2.1 Applying these principles to the present case,… [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:55 pm by Matthew Kahn
(b)  Heads of AI R&D agencies shall budget an amount for AI R&D that is appropriate for this prioritization. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:19 am by Dave
Assuming this matter goes forward, which one might think that it will unless it becomes academic, there are interesting arguments which may open up about amenability of HAs to JR (see (131)) and whether Agudas Israel was providing a system of allocation of social housing, without any relevant entitlements, or a service of providing housing accommodation – here the Divisional Court, at (50), offered a different opinion to that of Garnham J in R(XC) v Southwark… [read post]