Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 941 - 960 of 42,185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2019, 7:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
These experts are required to limit their evidence to matters within their expertise, and it’s not uncommon to see experts in a wide range of technological, medial, and other areas. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:18 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Related posts:Eidenmüller on the Optional Common European Sales Law as a Regulatory Tool Jurisdiction in Contract Matters in Brazil O’Hara and Ribstein on Conflict Rules and Global Competition [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:12 am
Because these cases continue to be treated as personal injury matters, some of the rules must be relaxed or modified. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Therefore, if no further action is taken, I will have made matters worse by complaining. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:11 am by Mara Hatfield
The admissibility of expert opinion evidence is a matter of procedure, subject only to the Court’s authority. [read post]
26 Sep 2006, 2:31 pm
" Although the Third and Sixth Circuits have employed a per se rule that voluntary retirement contributions are never a reasonable expense, the Ninth Circuit found no evidence that Congress intended a per se rule against retirement contributions. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 5:37 am
The relevant standard of the Court Rules does not relate only to matters which would necessarily be admissible in evidence, but includes information reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence respecting the cause of action or a defense. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:26 am
First, we are told what evidence is insufficient, namely mere coexistence of registrations and rudimentary evidence of use of the mark by the applicant. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 11:47 pm
” Significantly, the Appellate Division said that a court may neither “weight the evidence” nor reject the appointing authority’s decision with respect to the acceptance or rejection of evidence “where the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 3:23 am
" Significantly, the Appellate Division said that a court may neither "weight the evidence" nor reject the appointing authority's decision with respect to the acceptance or rejection of evidence "where the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:27 pm
That opens the door to discovery and evidence gathering, and makes it more likely the matter will go to trial. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:47 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
" Notably: "Although the issue of whether Plaintiff has the capacity or standing to pursue her claim is ordinarily a legal issue, the Court may not make the required determination as a matter of law if the parties present conflicting evidence regarding Plaintiff's condition. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:56 pm by Joy Waltemath
Rule Evid. 801(d)(2)(D) did not add a requirement that the declarant maintain the same scope of employment at the time the statement is made; the Rule requires only that the statement be made during the existence of the employment relationship, stressed the court. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:18 am by Wells Bennett
 Nevin says he had respected the protective order’s rules, in handling the leak matter and filing court documents related to it; but now, he says, the government has suggested that somehow, by affirming such compliance in his written pleadings, Nevin himself committed a secrecy infraction. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm by Lauren Bateman
The rest of the brief is a mea culpa: it concludes that the government “sincerely regrets not apprising the Court of these matters before its March 7 ruling and assures the Court that it will apply the utmost attention and coordination in its submission and all other matters before this Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:08 am by Alex Craigie
” (25-26) Rule No. 4: A rule of the road should be a requirement the defendant has violated (or, if you represent the defendant, one he has not violated). (22) Otherwise, why would that principle or standard matter? [read post]
   However, given this rule allowed attorneys to make a legal assessment as to what constitutes “material” evidence, the new rule clarified any ambiguity by requiring both lawyers and their disability claimants present any evidence, medical or non-medical, which “relates” to their disability claim. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:08 am by K&L Gates
  Currently, the proposed amendment (and all proposed rule amendments, for that matter) is being considered by the Supreme Court. [read post]