Search for: "Matter of Youngs v Youngs" Results 941 - 960 of 4,284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am by Alex Woolgar
As – in the grand scheme of things – a young and innovative court, it is valuable to get an insight into how the IPEC Small Claims court is used. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:07 am by CMS
In this case comment, Richard Bamforth and Laura West from CMS comment on the decision handed down last month in the matter of Micula and others v Romania [2020] UKSC 5. [read post]
Another Year, Another Attempt in Congress to Ban Non-Competes Nationwide Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Todd Young (R-Ind.) introduced legislation in 2019 entitled the Workforce Mobility Act (“WMA”). [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
IPSO took six months to rule on the matter, during which time a case officer became so concerned about Hindley’s mental state that she sent her contact details for the Samaritans. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:09 am by Thalia Kruger
pointed to the interesting discussion on whether vulnerability could only apply to young migrant children. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:54 am by SHG
Despite all of this and despite the presumed lens through which Wypijewski walked into the courtroom in the trial of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 1:32 pm by Charlotte Butash, Benjamin Wittes
See Government’s Supplemental and Amended Sentencing Memorandum, United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Young, P.C., 121 AD3d 969, 969 [2014]; see Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2015]; Landow v Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., 111 AD3d 795, 796 [2013]). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Young issued a Notice Order to Show Cause (Doc. 212.00) ordering David S. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Parliament has determined that such an order should expire when the young person reaches the age of 18. [read post]