Search for: "May v. Board of Directors" Results 941 - 960 of 5,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2013, 12:31 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
  Without further ado, here are this week's top posts:  Company directors: now is the time to put privacy risk on the Board’s agenda from Gadens Lawyers: There will substantial changes to the Privacy Act in Australia come March 2014, so Gadens encourages company directors to discuss it now. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Some situations may require a comprehensive investigation by an independent subset of the board aided by independent advisers. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:56 am
Only a governmental not-for-profit corporation’s records is subject to FOILMatter of Rumore v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of Buffalo, . 35 A.D.3d 1178 Philip Rumore, president of the Buffalo Teachers Federation, sought a court order directing the Board of Education of the City School District of Buffalo (Board) and the Education Innovation Consortium [EIC] to provide him with certain records and information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law… [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 10:58 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
According to the Court of Appeal in the recent case of Palm Springs Villas II Homeowners Association v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 1:00 pm by Mack Sperling
You probably thought that you would never again have to argue that a demand on a corporation's board of directors before filing a derivative action should be excused because it would have been futile. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 2:09 pm
  The district court in ASARCO LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in considering those claims, the fact that the companies are for-profit enterprises, or corporations, may well be relevant, whether or not they are determinative threshold considerations. 5. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Murthy v Missouri may become a landmark Supreme Court case in which the justices are led astray on the basis of a disinformation-laden record. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 10:27 pm by Scott McKeown
  The Director designated the Rehearing Denial precedential. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 1:35 pm by Jeff Gittins
Yesterday the Utah Supreme Court issued its ruling in the case of Southam v. [read post]