Search for: "May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
In a justly famous 1940 speech, then-Attorney General (and later Supreme Court Justice) Robert Jackson said “law enforcement is not automatic. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:58 am
So to summarize, if the Court takes the path hinted at in Trump v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 3:37 pm
From today's decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:34 am
In addition, on May 26, the Supreme Court ordered the parties to brief the following issues: (1) Do the appellants have standing to challenge the remedial map as a partisan gerrymander? [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 2:29 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and the Colorado and South Dakota Supreme Courts have considered such long-term surveillance a “search” because it infringes expectation of privacy that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy writes that if the Supreme Court rules for the “faithless elector” in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
It even has support in a Supreme Court dictum from 1903, in the case of Yamataya v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:41 am
However, the Colorado Supreme Court changed all of that in its May 2011 decision, Lucht’s Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 9:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
Pending the outcome of Proposition 307, Arizona’s top marginal rate will be capped at 4.5 percent, even though a final decision on Proposition 208 is still pending judicial review.[4] Since the Arizona Supreme Court refused to suspend the law[5] while a lower court adjudicates details pertaining to the measure’s revenue allocation, the surtax remains in effect. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
Colorado, the Court reversed its field, holding that the remedy was somehow severable from the amendment, and that state courts were therefore not obliged to enforce the exclusionary rule. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, addressed states’ authority to regulate LGBT issues; his opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:44 am
Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
As all even mildly well-read lawyers know, the Virginia Supreme Court held in Angel v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 5:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:04 pm
Supreme Court's ruling, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc, v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
ShareThe Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:41 am
Across court documents, the Justice Department cites United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 9:11 am
The United States Supreme Court has “long held that this provision contains an important implicit exception[:] Laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas are not patentable. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Abbott, holding that states and local governments may use total population to draw legislative districts, comes from Howard Mintz of The Mercury News. [read post]
