Search for: "Minor v. Black"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2017, 6:42 am
The result of this ploy is to wipe out the work place benefits for racial minorities and the improved work place environment that Congress intended” (Phillips v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:06 pm
At issue now, as it was when the Supreme Court decided the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:47 am
The claimants, who were all from black and ethnic minority backgrounds and aged over 35, failed the relevant test. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
* * * In 2002, after my wife and I had sufficiently recovered from Bush v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am
A few incidents of minor to slightly less minor severity spread over a two-year period is not sufficiently severe and pervasive to constitute an actionable hostile working environment. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:01 am
Palmore v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
After a relatively clear, albeit lengthy, discussion of why lawyers aren’t pro wrestlers, Paul’s solution to the merit v. genitalia problem is to redefine merit. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:12 am
It is a subtler case, but with profound implications for racial minorities in the UK. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
It is arguable that this has happened to the extent that some cases like FAPL v Murphy, or the Meltwater trilogy, have resulted in good precedents made by the UK courts, albeit backed up by CJEU referrals. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
In Wallace v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:19 am
Oh . . . pick a black one, those are more ‘scary’. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:04 am
In FCC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:29 am
Davis, in which the court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, lifted the death sentence of a Texas inmate whose defense expert had testified during sentencing that the defendant was more likely to be violent in the future because he is black, and Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:01 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:33 pm
Justice Kennedy with opinion in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 11:08 am
The decision came in the case of Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
The first is Packingham v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
In a recent case, San Francisco v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
“The reasonable person”, wrote Justices Claire L’Heureux-Dubé and Beverley McLachlin in R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 4:31 am
Some would argue that to blame the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, but not the Supreme Court’s decision in Mistretta v. [read post]
