Search for: "New York v. Connecticut" Results 941 - 960 of 1,723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
There’s nothing it can do about it, since it has no control over the competitor – short of closing its eyes to a potentially breakthrough new use for its product.DDLaw, More Thoughts On Conte v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:41 am by Jon Hyman
Army’s bathroom restriction on transgender employee was sex discrimination — via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Telecommuting as a reasonable accommodation: EEOC v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Schaufele IIICase number: 10-cv-05760 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: July 29, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 21, 2014 04/22/2014 07/21/2014 2014-38 SEC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
  Masri discusses the New York Get Law and there was no contract at all. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 12:53 pm by Christopher G. Hill
But, if you are in Hawaii or New York, you may have great difficulty in obtaining coverage. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
But, if you are in Hawaii or New York, you may have great difficulty in obtaining coverage. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
Marikina was a Connecticut corporation owned and managed by Romeo P. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:14 am by Gangemi P.C.
On December 16, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (which covers New York, Vermont and Connecticut) considered the dismissal by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of a plaintiff’s several employment discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment claims in violation of federal and New York State law. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Klein, an attorney with the New York plaintiff’s firm Outten & Golden, which represents the class in the Hearst case. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:39 am by Todd Ruger
Grassley said at that meeting that he voted against Hurwitz because of a New York Law School Law Review article that detailed his work as a clerk for Jon Newman, a district judge for the District of Connecticut whose decisions struck down laws restricting abortion. [read post]