Search for: "O S V Determination" Results 941 - 960 of 10,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2016, 6:32 am by Docket Navigator
" The court rejected defendant's argument that "'[t]o be relevant, the alleged copying must be of the patented feature of that product and not, for example, some unpatented feature.' The magnitude of the nexus between the alleged copying and the patented features determines whether evidence of copying should be 'given significant weight.'" Genband US LLC v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:07 am by J
The landlord applied for a determination of breach under s.168. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:07 am by J
The landlord applied for a determination of breach under s.168. [read post]